Titre : |
The Public Policy Exception Under the New York Convention |
Titre original : |
History, Interpretation and Application |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Anton G. MAURER, Auteur |
Editeur : |
JurisNet LLC |
Année de publication : |
2012 |
Importance : |
370 pages |
Format : |
Relié |
ISBN/ISSN/EAN : |
978-1-937518-03-5 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Catégories : |
Droit du commerce, droit du commerce international Droit international Privé Règlement des différends
|
Mots-clés : |
exception d'ordre public arbitrage international convention de New York |
Index. décimale : |
000 - pas d'indexation décimale connue |
Résumé : |
The Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention: History, Interpretation, and Application describes in detail the drafting history of the public policy exception of Art. V (2) (b) of the New York Convention in order to determine the purpose the signatory states wanted to achieve with this clause. The book also explains how this clause is applied by the courts in many economically relevant states, and especially in Brazil, Russia, India, and China.
In September 2012, the Indian Supreme Court, in a case entitled Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc., announced a long expected decision practically reversing the judgments of Bhatia International and Venture Global and holding that Indian Courts are not permitted to set aside foreign arbitral awards. In this Revised Edition, the author explains and explores the reasoning of the Indian Supreme Court in this landmark decision and discusses the practical implications and consequences.
Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention: History, Interpretation, and Application is of importance for all internationally active companies as well as for lawyers and courts. The book aids lawyers and companies in drafting arbitration clauses and in enforcing foreign arbitral awards. Often, judgments will not be enforced abroad; this is especially true with respect to an enforcement of foreign judgments in the BRIC countries. Therefore, internationally active companies and their advisors need guidance if and where foreign arbitral awards in their favor will be enforced abroad. |
The Public Policy Exception Under the New York Convention = History, Interpretation and Application [texte imprimé] / Anton G. MAURER, Auteur . - JurisNet LLC, 2012 . - 370 pages ; Relié. ISBN : 978-1-937518-03-5 Langues : Anglais ( eng)
Catégories : |
Droit du commerce, droit du commerce international Droit international Privé Règlement des différends
|
Mots-clés : |
exception d'ordre public arbitrage international convention de New York |
Index. décimale : |
000 - pas d'indexation décimale connue |
Résumé : |
The Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention: History, Interpretation, and Application describes in detail the drafting history of the public policy exception of Art. V (2) (b) of the New York Convention in order to determine the purpose the signatory states wanted to achieve with this clause. The book also explains how this clause is applied by the courts in many economically relevant states, and especially in Brazil, Russia, India, and China.
In September 2012, the Indian Supreme Court, in a case entitled Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc., announced a long expected decision practically reversing the judgments of Bhatia International and Venture Global and holding that Indian Courts are not permitted to set aside foreign arbitral awards. In this Revised Edition, the author explains and explores the reasoning of the Indian Supreme Court in this landmark decision and discusses the practical implications and consequences.
Public Policy Exception under the New York Convention: History, Interpretation, and Application is of importance for all internationally active companies as well as for lawyers and courts. The book aids lawyers and companies in drafting arbitration clauses and in enforcing foreign arbitral awards. Often, judgments will not be enforced abroad; this is especially true with respect to an enforcement of foreign judgments in the BRIC countries. Therefore, internationally active companies and their advisors need guidance if and where foreign arbitral awards in their favor will be enforced abroad. |
| |