[n° ou bulletin] 

Titre :	V36 N4 2020 - 2020/4 - Volume 36 Number 4
Type de document :	texte imprimé
Année de publication :	2020
Langues :	Français (fre)
Catégories :	Périodiques
Note de contenu :	Articles The grapes of dispute resolution: arbitration and wine Michel Menjucq, Laurent Gouiffès Hybrid (institutional) arbitration clauses: party autonomy gone wild Carlos Molina Esteban Don’t rage against the machine: why AI may be the cure for the ‘moral hazard’ of party appointments Mel Andrew Schwing Case Notes Irreconcilable perspectives like in an Escher’s drawing? Extension of an arbitration agreement to a non-signatory state and attribution of state entities’ conduct: privity of contract in Swiss and investment arbitral tribunals’ case law Martina Magnarelli, Andreas R Ziegler Resurrecting the debate on ‘due process paranoia’ in Centrotrade: Paranoia or Judiciousness? Soumyajit Saha, Smriti Shukla Recent Developments To boycott proceedings or not? Recourse against arbitral awards on jurisdictional grounds by different categories of respondents under the Model Law Darius Chan, Claire Neoh The Silent Spring of Human Rights in Investment Arbitration: Jurisprudence Constante through Case-Law Trajectory Riddhi Dhananjay Joshi, Shashikala Gurpur The extension of arbitration agreements to third parties through the lens of Egyptian courts Ibrahim Shehata Exploring the prospects of host-state counterclaims in corruption disputes Chitransh Vijayvergia, Pavan Belmannu Portigon v Spain: new frontiers for financial institutions in investor–state arbitration? Kate Apostolova
En ligne :	https://academic.oup.com/arbitration/issue/36/4

[n° ou bulletin]  V36 N4 2020 - 2020/4 - Volume 36 Number 4 [texte imprimé] . - 2020.
Langues : Français (fre)

Catégories :	Périodiques
Note de contenu :	Articles The grapes of dispute resolution: arbitration and wine Michel Menjucq, Laurent Gouiffès Hybrid (institutional) arbitration clauses: party autonomy gone wild Carlos Molina Esteban Don’t rage against the machine: why AI may be the cure for the ‘moral hazard’ of party appointments Mel Andrew Schwing Case Notes Irreconcilable perspectives like in an Escher’s drawing? Extension of an arbitration agreement to a non-signatory state and attribution of state entities’ conduct: privity of contract in Swiss and investment arbitral tribunals’ case law Martina Magnarelli, Andreas R Ziegler Resurrecting the debate on ‘due process paranoia’ in Centrotrade: Paranoia or Judiciousness? Soumyajit Saha, Smriti Shukla Recent Developments To boycott proceedings or not? Recourse against arbitral awards on jurisdictional grounds by different categories of respondents under the Model Law Darius Chan, Claire Neoh The Silent Spring of Human Rights in Investment Arbitration: Jurisprudence Constante through Case-Law Trajectory Riddhi Dhananjay Joshi, Shashikala Gurpur The extension of arbitration agreements to third parties through the lens of Egyptian courts Ibrahim Shehata Exploring the prospects of host-state counterclaims in corruption disputes Chitransh Vijayvergia, Pavan Belmannu Portigon v Spain: new frontiers for financial institutions in investor–state arbitration? Kate Apostolova
En ligne :	https://academic.oup.com/arbitration/issue/36/4